In his new book, Peace Kills: America’s Fun New Imperialism, P.J.O’Rourke casts a cynical eye over four marches that occurred simultaneously in Washington D.C. a couple of years ago.
These rallies, which came together in one mass of futility, had such a dearth of shared purpose, not to mention a lack of talent in political street theatre, that O’Rourke regarded them as “pointless”.
Without being nostalgic, back in the good old days, when skeletons squirmed in King George Square after being nuked by realistic, if cardboard, bombs, political street theatre was not only enjoyable, but chillingly accurate as well.
If we give O’Rourke any credence, then seventy-five thousand activists, or seventy-five or seventy-five million depending on if you’ve talked to cops or organisers, would’ve achieved more for their causes, all seventy-five billion of them, if they’d stayed home and sung Dylan songs instead.
Unfortunately, “Mr Tambourine Man” doesn’t annoy parents like he used to in the sixties, the seventies, the eighties and the nineties (I adore Bob, so I won’t go in for that easy gibe and say he still irritates those with musical taste, and since I also love Peter, Paul and Mary mine isn’t in question).
The assessment that such a huge gathering of humanity (nobody includes hippies and ferals in head counts so the real figure was seventy-five billion) wasted everyone’s time makes me wonder whether I should’ve spent my, well, early 20s, more wisely than going to demonstrations that were perhaps as meaningless as the ones O’Rourke derides.
Given the only people who attended many of them were members of Resistance, the cultish youth wing of the Democratic Socialists, and a few ALP types eager to prove they weren’t careerists like their foes in the right and on the left, there can be no other conclusion drawn; there was a slim chance going to lectures might have been more valuable, even though I was doing political science (“those with dole forms queue in front of me, please”).
At least it wasn’t gender studies, sociology, philosophy, history, education, engineering, medicine, science or law.
While important issues need to be visible and protests can make a difference with persistence, press, shifting public opinion and retrospection, to my knowledge the Prime Minister hasn’t resigned because someone dawdled up Adelaide Street chanting “hey, hoe, hey, hoe, John Howard has got to go, hey, hoe, hey, hoe, John Howard has got a big toe, hey, hoe, hey, hoe”.
I genuinely believe, however, that Australia’s policy towards asylum seekers changed perpetually after Merlin from Big Brother held up a “Free th(sic) Refugees” sign and refused to tell Gretel who in the house had the worst habit.
Though never receiving the attention of Merlin’s stunt, the marches I’ve been to include: several (hundred?) opposing upfront fees, supporting the maritime workers, IVF access for lesbians, against the GST, not in favor of GST on tampons and presumably other sanitary products, International Women’s Day and one at the Irish Club when we were livid women weren’t allowed to dine with the PM.
“Hey, hoe, hey, hoe, John Howard has got to go, hey, hoe, hey, hoe, John Howard didn’t want women eating Irish food of which I know nothing, no, no, hey, hoe, hey, hoe”.
That event was memorable for its thuggish air and the radical who tried to kick a door down (the tucker can’t of been that good, sister), but I also recall the meeting in Roma Street Forum graced with the presence of around thirty students, which was too bad for the union, as they’d hired out almost as many buses as there was people.
About ten of those present were Young Liberals who came to mock; surprisingly they were slightly amusing and it was fun pondering why youthful male right-wingers all wear moccasins and shorts below their knees.
Presumably, it’s because they feel sensible shoes are better for running the country in and that while doing so you shouldn’t get Young Liberal girls unduly excited.
While most of the protests I’ve trudged along in, except the one just referred to and a few others, were worthy and true, I quote O’Rourke in attempting to answer the question of whether any I was at achieved anything: “five, four, three, two/(I) don’t have a doggone clue”.
Another Quote from P.J. O’Rourke’s Peace Kills: America’s Fun New Imperialism
“America is not a wily, sneaky nation. We don’t think that way. We don’t think much at all, thank God. Start thinking and pretty soon you get ideas, and then you get idealism, and the next thing you know you’ve get ideology, with millions dead in concentration camps and gulags”.
As a shameless media tart, I’d invite you to visit my website, but I haven’t updated it for a bit. Nevertheless, you can find it here.
June 18, 2004 | Unknown
The Long March: Adventures in Unenthusiastic Activism
3 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
What was the point of this post, ?Darlene? You went to all these rallies and achieved nothing? You are a burned out radical? You have joined the mob who like to make a joke out of a serious thing?
You had me puzzled & then you finished off with a true piece of idiocy:-
Another Quote from P.J. O’Rourke’s Peace Kills: America’s Fun New Imperialism
“America is not a wily, sneaky nation. We don’t think that way. We don’t think much at all, thank God. Start thinking and pretty soon you get ideas, and then you get idealism, and the next thing you know you’ve get ideology, with millions dead in concentration camps and gulags”.
You do not give your attitude to this. But it is such boring reissue of the old “end of ideology” rubbish, which actually peaked around the 60s. Please give us a break. Only the very stupid do not realise that the Bush Administration is deeply driven by an ideology compounded out of Straussian neo-Machiavelianism and loony fringe Christianity.
regards
Gary
Comment by Gary MacLennan — June 20, 2004 @ 2:26 am
Hi Gary.
What can I say, I’m just trying to entertain the punters.
I try to write satirical and serious stuff in my posts (and sometimes the former should be directed at others besides the Federal Government and David Flint).
I do not think that any topic is beyond humour, and it can be a subversive thing.
The article was inspired by a chapter in O’Rourke’s latest book. O’Rourke has a particular political agenda, but I enjoy his satire, and, I think, he is at his best when pointing out some of the foibles of the left. But, I also enjoy the satire of The Chaser and CNNNN crowd as well, and probably am more in tune politically with them (at a discussion forum I went to that featured a couple of their members they said they liked to take the mick out of the left and right).
I do say that most of the causes were “worthy and true”, but surely there wouldn’t be too many people who haven’t been to a march and not felt at the end that little was achieved. I suspect marches no longer make the impact they once did, and the lack of cohesion of some of them these days makes it less likely they will.
I could hardly claim to ever having been a radical: I have been a member of the ALP for five years and previous to that I spent ten months with the Australian Democrats. Perhaps I am a burned-out moderate.
As for the last quote, I think America is a very ideological so P.J. is wrong there, but I support the general premise that it (whether of the left or right) can lead to terrible things.
Comment by Darlene — June 21, 2004 @ 6:10 pm
Taking part in protest marches is good for your health (unless you protest in some parts of USA) so say a group of UK doctors.
Even if your protest march does not achieve the set goal at least the protestors have done themselves some good and have had the courage to show their beliefs.
It sure beats sitting in front of the TV and moaning about the prime miniature and his latest efforts to make more enemies for Australia.
John Schindler
Boddington
WA
Comment by John Schindler — June 23, 2004 @ 6:42 pm